A native Scandinavian should be able to translate the Poetic Edda very well–at least, that’s what readers expect. Unfortunately, Titchell doesn’t measure up. Not only does she insist on putting a Theosophical spin on her translations (East meets North–UGH!), but she renders the proper names in a confusing mixture of Old Norse, English, and Swedish. One kindred that I hoped to join had this book on its required reading list; after buying and reading this book, I had second thoughts about joining. (Anyone who can’t accept Norse philosophy on its own terms shouldn’t write or teach about it!)
Yet another book in the same vein as his previous two; he produced it with the help of a Christian minister, which should give you some idea of how seriously he takes Germanic pagan beliefs. The only good thing about it is the cheap rune set that comes packaged with the book. If you’re a rune reader who desperately needs to replace a lost set, buy this book–then throw it away and keep the runes.
Ingeborg Svea Norden reviews The Book of Runes: A Handbook for the Use of an Ancient Oracle: The Viking Runes with Stones: 10th Anniversary Edition by Ralph H Blum in the Bkwyrm archive.
To people seriously interested in the runes, this one has become infamous. The research is way out in left field, depending heavily on non-Germanic religious texts and Blum’s personal experience with divination. Most other authors I’ve read would disagree violently with his interpretations of the runes: his notes on Thurisaz, for instance, say the exact opposite of Gundarsson’s or Aswynn’s. Maybe one of my current rune students had the best idea: “When I get home, I’m throwing that book in the trash!” Blum is also the author of “Rune Play,” which is just as bad as his first book.
Ingeborg Svea Norden reviews Teutonic Religion: Folk Beliefs & Practices of the Northern Tradition by Kveldulf Gundarsson in the Bkwyrm archive.
This book says little about runes as such; it’s mostly rituals, plus some comments on the gods and on the problems that Norse pagans have to deal with in the modern world.
My main problem with this one is Gundarsson’s choice of language: First, he insists on calling the gods by their Old High German names, instead of the familiar Norse ones he used in _Teutonic Magic._ (A typical newcomer to Germanic paganism would not know that “Frija” is actually Frigg, and “the Frowe” mean Freya!) Second, the rituals themselves (and even a few spots in the main text) are full of revived “Germanic English” words that few non-linguists would recognize or use. A priest who had to check a glossary every three minutes would spoil the atmosphere at a large Heathen gathering, to put it mildly. Other than the language problem, though, Gundarsson’s second book is as well-researched and thoughtful as the first. He does his level best to convince people that Asatru is spiritually valid and relevant in the present-day world.
Ingeborg Svea Norden reviews Teutonic Magic: The Magical & Spiritual Practices of the Germanic Peoples by Kveldulf Gundarsson in the Bkwyrm archive.
This man knows his subject better than anyone else I’ve read so far. (He recently completed a graduate degree in Teutonic studies at Cambridge; he has also done plenty of field research in Scandinavia, England, and Germany.) Besides, Gundarsson can write! Other authors have written commentaries and guided meditations on the runes, but his feel three-dimensional; people can tell that he has had some experience with theater and ritual drama. He also makes excellent comments on the gods, on non-runic symbolism in Germanic magic, and on integrating Asatru philosophy with modern life. Only a few mistakes – which Gundarsson discovered AFTER the book was published – keep this book from earning a full four-star rating. His interpretations of two specific runes (Elhaz and Ingwaz) were heavily influenced by his mentor Edred Thorsson’s. So was his interpretation of the Valkyrie as a guardian angel/Higher Self figure, which does not mesh with actual pagan texts. With those reservations in mind, I still recommend Teutonic Magic heartily.
The author is a ceremonial magician, more at home with the Qabala than with anything Norse–and it shows in his book. Tyson’s rituals read as if he’d stolen them from a Judeo-Christian magical group and substituted Norse god-names for the originals. His interpretations of the runes also tend toward black-and-white thinking, more Biblical than Norse. (He translates Thurisaz as “devil”, saying that the rune “signifies a bad man or woman” in a reading.) The book also contains some rather poor poetry which Tyson supposedly channeled in an attempt to “communicate with each rune”.
Ingeborg Svea Norden reviews Runic States: a Shamanic Perception of Quantum Realities by Kevin Steffens in the Bkwyrm archive.
Steffens seems interested in making the runes relevant and understandable to a modern audience–which is a good thing in itself, although his approach isn’t. It’s hard to take the author of a magic book seriously when he constantly alludes to science fiction and pop culture; it’s also hard to accept someone who ignores some basic beliefs of the culture he draws on (like the moon being male and the sun female in Norse tradition). To make matters worse, Steffens makes some very sexist remarks about the role of women in both ancient and modern cultures; this alone will offend some female readers.
Ingeborg Svea Norden reviews Northern Magic: Mysteries of the Norse, Germans & English by Edred Thorsson in the Bkwyrm archive.
As far as I know, Northern Magic is the only esoteric rune book in print that is based on the Younger Futhark (the 16-letter rune alphabet used in Scandinavia). Thorsson’s comments don’t go into as much depth here as in his other books, but then the book itself is about half as long as Futhark. He is clearer and more concise than usual, though; for a beginner interested in specifically Norse magic, this book is a good choice.
In addition to his remarks about actual runes, Thorsson spends two chapters talking about other magical symbols (hex signs and sigils) used in Germanic spellworking. This too makes Northern Magic well worth buying and reading.
This book first came out in the late 1980’s, and many rune magicians still consider it a classic. Several later authors, including Gundarsson, have been inspired by Futhark to some extent.
Thorsson discusses the meanings and magical uses of each rune in detail, backing them with references from Norse pagan texts and Germanic folklore. He does occasionally allude to other esoteric traditions, but this doesn’t feel as intrusive as it does in some other books. (My only complaint here is the table of astrological and Tarot correspondences at the end of the book; the runes, in my opinion, should be able to stand on their own as a magical system.)
I would still recommend this book ten years after I first bought it, although Thorsson’s language may be too dry and academic for popular readers.
A straightforward, easy-to-read book on divination and rune magic. He may not have Gundarsson’s gift for vivid writing, but he does have some thought-provoking comments and enough good solid research to back them up.